CalSTRS Beefs Up its PE Co-Investments to Lower Costs, Improve Returns
CalSTRS has saved more than $1.6 billion in costs since 2017 thanks to its collaborative model approach, which brings more assets in-house and encourages the use of different investment vehicles, including co-investment, joint ventures, SMAs, direct ownership and revenue share. Now, as it sets its targets for the next five years, it’s looking to measure the other benefits of the program, including boosted returns and more control over risks.
As institutional investors around the world invest in more private assets, facing liquidity risks and resourcing pressures, they are often looking at how to evolve and adapt into a more direct-investing model. For CalSTRS, the $304 billion fund for Californian teachers, the evolution into private markets took on a slightly different approach through a collaborative model that focuses on partnerships and innovative structures.
Since the fund moved into this model five years ago, it has achieved average annual savings of $273.5 million and has now set an internal target of an additional estimated $200 to $300 million a year of savings over the next five years.
In an interview with Top1000funds.com from his Sacramento office, deputy chief investment officer Scott Chan says the fund will also consider measuring more directly the other benefits of increased returns and control over risks.
The collaborative model includes more internally managed assets, with 62 per cent of the portfolio now managed internally. But as the fund moves more into private assets, the collaborative model focuses not just on internal management but how CalSTRS can partner with external providers in innovative ways to achieve similar benefits.
“As we shifted more into private assets we didn’t think we could build an ‘internal Blackstone’, so we decided to build a model to leverage our partners,” Chan says. “We desire to be the partner of choice, and that is not just a term of hubris, but a term for our partners to know we want to develop a relationship with them. It’s reciprocal.”
Chan says this means the team at CalSTRS is very active in its work with fund manager partners, aiming to be nimble, responsible and knowledgeable.
“We want to be trusted experts and be nimble. For example, if they have a co-investment request we want to come back in the same day,” he says.
The model includes a whole toolkit of flexible structures including SMAs, comingled funds, co-investment, joint ventures with managers and peers, minority or majority interests and full ownership.
In the first year the fund participated in 106 collaborative model transactions, and in the past year that has grown to 371 including 309 collaborative private structures, 60 internally managed funds and two rebate agreements, resulting in $428 million of savings in 2022 alone (growing from $134 million in savings in the first year of the model).
While Chan says the cost savings “get the headlines” what is less talked about are the benefits to returns and managing risks.
“We have to look holistically. We are net-return investors and are trying to create value in the costs savings and returns through innovative structures,” he says.
“The evolution is we will do more SMAs and co-investment, but we will also do joint ventures, revenue shares, minority shares and outright ownership, in an order that looks like a pyramid. They all have resourcing needs that are sophisticated at the top of the pyramid. When you own an asset manager you need two staff full-time to manage that organisation strategically. The goal of that would be adding 3 to 7 per cent to the IRR, which is significant.”
According to Chan the collaborative model has been a contributor to net value added, with alpha-above-benchmark over three years of 97 basis points, five-year alpha of 67 basis points and 29 basis points over 10 years.
He says it is also contributing to a fuller understanding of risk.
“It is helping to move the dial on risk because as we get to know and partner with managers on the ground floor, our PMs end up understanding the risks a lot better,” he says.
“Out of that we want to own this risk long-term and sell that risk to the market. We want to inherently know what to retain and sell. For an investor with 43 per cent in private assets it is important to manage the risks.”
Execution risk
A direct result of the collaborative model is that CalSTRS internally is taking on more execution risk, which has a direct implications for the size and quality of the team.
“We are taking on more execution risk and that falls on having more staff and more resources but also more sophisticated resources to be able to manage those risks and mitigate them. The good news about execution risk is you can mitigate it, versus market risk where you’re just taking the beta.”
In its 2021-22 five-year plan the fund outlined 91 new hires and has developed a plan to hire more staff to manage and mitigate the execution risk and to train and equip the current staff. The CalSTRS investment team currently numbers 231.
“We need people who have more of a background to suit those types of investments,” Chan says.
“We are powering up the co-investment unit and recently hired an ex-VP from KKR, and a PM from ADIA.
“All the credit goes to the team; they have executed this excellently. We have a great team and culture, they feel empowered and have delegation up and down the chain. We have a streamlined decision-making process and they can be nimble in the marketplace.”
Next phase: Evolving structures
The first phase of the collaborative model was to get every division and team executing collaborative model deals in their own way.
Five years ago about 2.5 per cent of the private equity book was co-invested, now it’s about 25 per cent with a new target of 35 per cent.
Other asset classes take on a different look. In real estate about 80 per cent of the portfolio is in joint ventures with managers, and CalSTRS also owns majority interests in a few real estate operating companies, in what is a more strategic move.
“Each of our partners is unique and the transactions are unique, so we go to the partners and say let’s be innovative, they have the canvas,” Chan says.
A lot of the opportunities in the fund’s sustainable investment portfolio were falling between asset classes, so a collaborative model was adopted from the outset.
“Now, because we have expertise across the whole organisation, we can execute a collaborative model straight away,” Chan says.
“We have a partnership with Just Climate, which is part of Generation, where we co-invest and have a strategic stake in the business. The exciting thing is we have the expertise to do any of these structures and can map it to new endeavours that we see coming up.”
Private credit is another area the fund is looking at strategically. It recently made a 2 per cent strategic allocation and it’s approaching the investments innovatively.
“Private credit is where we want to drive a lot of co-investment and as the industry grows we can take some shots at owning and growing with these organisations,” Chan says. “Where we have taken an ownership stake or revenue share is in areas where we want to grow together with the organisation, be strategic and on the ground. We think private credit will continue to grow and an area we want to grow with a select number of groups and we’ve done some revenue shares, owning the managers.”
Chan says as the fund moves into the next phase of the collaborative model it will move more into joint ventures and revenue share and ownership.
“Doing co-investment is something we can do well and at scale, joint ventures, revenue share or ownership takes more time and we can get more efficient and be more prolific. As we evolve we will likely be evolving from SMAs and co-investment to be doing more revenue share and minority and majority ownership. It will look like a pyramid. It’s got be strategic for us to have that stake, we won’t do it very often but it’s an area we are growing into.”
There are two US pension giants in California everyone knows about, CalPERS and CalSTRS.
They are similar but CalSTRS has always been a little more proactive in adopting elements of the Canadian model.
Reading the interview with Scott Chan above, you'd think CalSTRS was a Canadian pension fund, part of the Maple 8.
Well, not quite, their governance isn't as good but they seem to still get things done and are able to attract people from KKR and ADIA to power up their co-investment unit.
Notice how co-investments make up 25% of CalSTRS' Private Equity portfolio and they want to bring it up to 35%.
For most of the Maple 8, co-investments make up 50% or close to that.
This explains how they lower fees, deliver alpha in PE and remain well allocated in the asset class.
CalSTRS is on its way there, managing 62% of its assets internally (Maple 8 manage 80% or more internally).
Moreover, it is ramping up private credit where it wants to drive a lot of the co-investment as the industry grows,.
What else? Last month, Arleen Jacobius of Pension & Investments reported CalSTRS is expected to consider using leverage to manage risk:
CalSTRS' investment committee in January is expected to consider adding the use of leverage to its toolkit to help staff manage liquidity and reduce risk.
As CalSTRS has been increasing its exposure to private markets, most recently by boosting its private debt allocation, it would be helpful for staff to be able to use some leverage during market downturns to get to market exposure and to continue committing capital to private assets, Jimenez said.
CalSTRS absolutely needs to adopt leverage just like Canada's Maple 8 and CalPERS which recently adopted it.
It makes no sense to be a forced seller when markets get hit hard when you're a long-term pension fund so by adopting this, they can mitigate risk like risk of selling at the wrong time.
Lastly, last week Bloomberg reported that the $76 billion Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System saw its private equity hit by exits:
One of the biggest US public pensions lost most of its private equity team after the fund made changes that would crimp the group’s ability to allocate to the alternative asset class.
Four members of the Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System private equity investing team are retiring or have accepted new jobs, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
The pension’s director of private equity and co-investments, Darren Foreman, will retire in January, while Patrick Knapp, Tony Meadows and Philip VanGraafeiland are pursuing new opportunities, according to some of the people.
Susan Oh, a director who has been at the pension fund for almost 29 years, is also leaving, people with knowledge of the matter said. Oh, who has focused on equity bets and currency hedging, most recently specialized in sustainable investing through a role in culture and transformative innovation, according to her LinkedIn profile.
The pension said it doesn’t comment on personnel-related matters, though a spokesperson said it has 63 investment professionals on the staff, a dozen of whom are primarily responsible for private markets. Departing members of the investment team declined to comment or didn’t immediately respond.
The Pennsylvania school pension had about $76 billion of assets as of Sept. 30. Private equity accounted for about $12 billion of its portfolio as of March 31, according to its asset-allocation report. That included funds managed by Apollo Global Management Inc., Bain Capital and Cerberus Capital Management.
‘Very Skeptical’
Private equity has performed well for the pension, delivering an almost 13% annualized return over the 10 years through March — the highest of any asset class, according to the fund’s most recent quarterly performance report.
But that has left it with a higher allocation to the asset class than its target, and the fund has said it will invest less in private equity to lower the proportion from 17% to the targeted 12%.
That overallocation puts the fund in the same position as other public pensions that are pulling back on private equity and creating a difficult fundraising environment for many buyout firms.
“I’m very much skeptical about private assets,” PSERS Chief Investment Officer Benjamin Cotton recently told the Philadelphia Inquirer. “You should earn a premium for locking your money into non-traded assets.”
Cotton’s statement related to “an aversion to paying premium fees without earning a premium return on the investment, regardless of asset class,” a PSERS spokesman said Thursday.
Benjamin Cotton isn't wrong, if you have the wrong approach in private equity, you're paying big fees and getting mediocre returns.
You absolutely need to ramp up co-investments and use secondary market to shore up liquidity.
This just tells me they have two issues there - a governance issue and an investment portfolio issue where they need more flexibility over the target allocations in private equity and other private markets.
All the pieces of the puzzle need to fit nicely and Scott Chan is right, it's not just about cost savings, it's about risk mitigation and making sure you can execute to add important alpha in the asset class.
Alright, let me wrap it up there.
Below, Chris Ailman, Chief Investment Officer at the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), joins Bloomberg Radio to discuss recession fears and pressure on public funding.
Ailman thinks we have reached peak rates and said they're not taking big bets for next year as they think recession lies ahead.
Take the time to listen to Chris, he is an excellent CIO who knows what he's talking about.
Comments
Post a Comment